Boeing 747SP vs 747-100

The 747SP cut the -100's fuselage by nearly 48 ft to fly 5,830 nautical miles on a full load — further than any 747 of its generation, at the cost of 40 or more seats.

The 747SP answered a question everyone else had given up on: what if the 747 were built to fly further instead of to carry more? Boeing’s answer cut the fuselage by nearly 48 ft, and the result — for four seats per row fewer than a 747-100 — became the longest-range 747 of its generation.

Why shorten an airliner

The 747-100 could carry 366 people about 4,620–5,300 nautical miles. The routes Pan Am wanted — Tehran to New York, and the long Pacific sectors — needed more range than a full 747-100 could deliver.

Removing a fuselage plug does two things at once: it cuts weight for the same wing and engines, and it cuts drag. The SP’s 5,830-nautical-mile range came from exactly that — not from more fuel, but from less aircraft to carry.

747-100 747SP
Fuselage length 231 ft 10 in 184 ft 9 in
Wingspan 195 ft 8 in 195 ft 8 in (unchanged)
Passengers, 3-class 366 276
Max takeoff weight 735,000 lb 700,000 lb
Range ~4,620–5,300 nmi 5,830 nmi (10,800 km)
Cruise Mach 0.84 Mach 0.86

The trade that nobody repeated

The SP’s trick was never repeated, for a reason: it was a niche answer to a niche question. It carried over forty fewer people at a higher cost per seat than a -100, and once the later, heavier classics such as the -200B could match its range while lifting a full main deck, the SP’s reason to exist evaporated.

It was ordered for one job and done: 45 built, against 168 -100s. Its survivors include government and VIP examples, which valued exactly what the design gives — a long-range 747 with the shortest fuselage Boeing could hang on the standard wing. In the identification guide it is the instant answer: if the tail looks too big for the body, it is the SP.

Key specifications
ManufacturerBoeing
Variant747SP vs 747-100
First flight4 July 1975 vs 9 February 1969
Introduced1976 vs 1970
StatusBoth retired from scheduled passenger service
EnginesJT9D vs JT9D
Typical capacity276 (3-class) vs 366 (3-class)
Range5,830 nmi (10,800 km) vs ~4,620–5,300 nmi
Length184 ft 9 in (56.31 m) vs 231 ft 10 in (70.66 m)
Wingspan195 ft 8 in (59.64 m) vs 195 ft 8 in (59.64 m)
Max takeoff weight700,000 lb (318 t) vs 735,000 lb (333 t)
Cruise speedMach 0.86 vs Mach 0.84
Number built45 vs 168

Frequently asked questions

Why did Boeing build the 747SP shorter than the 747-100?
Pan Am needed an aircraft that could fly the longest routes with a full load. Shortening the fuselage cut weight and drag enough that the SP could fly about 5,830 nautical miles, further than any other 747 of its generation.
How can you identify a 747SP?
Its proportions: a full-size 747 wing and an oversized tail on a fuselage nearly 48 ft shorter than a 747-100, giving it an unmistakably stubby silhouette.

Sources

Facts on this page are checked against the primary and institutional references below.

  1. 747-100, -200, -300 and SP airport-planning manual — Boeing
  2. 747 classic passenger performance summary — Boeing